Is Income “Property”? Key Legal Question in WA Income Tax Lawsuit
Up Next
8 videosCan anti-Semitism enforcement conflict with First Amendment rights?
April 18th, 2025
Department of State Spokesperson Tammy Bruce: "All This Could Stop In a Moment"
March 31st, 2025
President Trump on Russia & Ukraine
March 25th, 2025
How is Illinois responding to Trump's proposed changes to education funding?
March 7th, 2025
How Important Do You Think It Is to Eliminate Old Regulations When Introducing New Ones?
February 21st, 2025
Gov. Pritzker: “There’s No Emergency in Chicago.”
September 2nd, 2025
Illinois collects $82M from delinquent taxpayers, expects $241M total
November 3rd, 2025
VP Vance Praises Hungary's Energy Policies, Holds Up Orbán as Example of Leadership
April 7th, 2026
A major legal battle over Washington’s income tax may come down to one critical question: Is income considered property under the state constitution? Challengers filed their lawsuit in Klickitat County, a move that could impact the outcome as they seek a potentially more favorable court venue. Former Attorney General Rob McKenna argues the Washington Constitution is clear—income is property, and taxing it without following constitutional limits could violate the law. Supporters of the tax disagree, setting up a high-stakes legal showdown that could ultimately be decided by the Washington State Supreme Court. 👉 Topics covered: Washington income tax lawsuit explained Is income considered property? Rob McKenna’s constitutional argument Why court venue matters in legal cases Washington Supreme Court implications 🔔 Subscribe for more updates on Washington politics and legal battles