Is Income “Property”? Key Legal Question in WA Income Tax Lawsuit
Up Next
8 videosShould elite universities risk billions by defying federal demands?
April 18th, 2025
How will the administration ensure ineligible individuals aren’t receiving benefits?
April 15th, 2025
Why Is the Healthcare Sector Gaining Jobs?
August 6th, 2024
Sec. Kennedy on Insurance: “Agree to Get Rid of Pre-authorization”
July 30th, 2025
Is the stock market fueled by hype and FOMO?
October 15th, 2025
White House cites September jobs report as evidence of economic strength
November 20th, 2025
Rep. Dye: Wind And Solar Are Insufficient Energy Sources For Ratepayers
April 8th, 2026
‘Overpromised, Underdelivered?’ Questions Grow Over Sound Transit
May 12th, 2026
A major legal battle over Washington’s income tax may come down to one critical question: Is income considered property under the state constitution? Challengers filed their lawsuit in Klickitat County, a move that could impact the outcome as they seek a potentially more favorable court venue. Former Attorney General Rob McKenna argues the Washington Constitution is clear—income is property, and taxing it without following constitutional limits could violate the law. Supporters of the tax disagree, setting up a high-stakes legal showdown that could ultimately be decided by the Washington State Supreme Court. 👉 Topics covered: Washington income tax lawsuit explained Is income considered property? Rob McKenna’s constitutional argument Why court venue matters in legal cases Washington Supreme Court implications 🔔 Subscribe for more updates on Washington politics and legal battles