Is Income “Property”? Key Legal Question in WA Income Tax Lawsuit
Up Next
8 videosRFK Jr: "There’s at Least One Pharmaceutical Lobbyist for E- Every Congressman Every Senator”
May 12th, 2025
Should public figures be allowed to have an onlyfans account?
March 15th, 2025
President Trump: "You hide behind a tree and the drone comes down, and it circles you with fire."
May 15th, 2025
Gov. Pritzker: "The Trump Administration Is Spending Wildly on Tax Cuts"
June 16th, 2025
Spokesperson Pigott on Gaza: “The Main Driver Here Is Creative Solutions”
August 7th, 2025
How Would a Deployment in Chicago Compare to What Happened in Los Angeles?
September 3rd, 2025
President Trump: Congo–Rwanda peace deal creates framework for economic prosperity
December 5th, 2025
Could Income Tax Revenue Be Matched By Constructing More Homes?
March 22nd, 2026
A major legal battle over Washington’s income tax may come down to one critical question: Is income considered property under the state constitution? Challengers filed their lawsuit in Klickitat County, a move that could impact the outcome as they seek a potentially more favorable court venue. Former Attorney General Rob McKenna argues the Washington Constitution is clear—income is property, and taxing it without following constitutional limits could violate the law. Supporters of the tax disagree, setting up a high-stakes legal showdown that could ultimately be decided by the Washington State Supreme Court. 👉 Topics covered: Washington income tax lawsuit explained Is income considered property? Rob McKenna’s constitutional argument Why court venue matters in legal cases Washington Supreme Court implications 🔔 Subscribe for more updates on Washington politics and legal battles